Clean beauty retailer standards — Clean at Sephora, Conscious Beauty at Ulta, Target Clean, the Credo Clean Standard and others — are private ingredient exclusion lists with no legal force and complete commercial force: a formula fully compliant with the EU Cosmetic Regulation and MoCRA can still be refused shelf space for one preservative. This is the least-served corner of cosmetic compliance tooling, because most of it is built around government regulation. Tamats compiles 13 retailer programmes alongside the government rules and publishes the list; Good Face Project names retailers as a customer segment without enumerating which standards it screens; Cosmetri, CM Studio+ and Formulator Online do not mention retailer standards in their published material.
Retailer clean standards are private lists with no legal force and complete commercial force. A formula can be fully compliant with the EU Cosmetic Regulation and MoCRA and still be refused by a buyer because one preservative appears on a retailer's banned list. This is the least-served corner of the category: most compliance tooling is built around government regulation, and the retailer lists are the ones that actually stop launches.
We make one of these. Tamats is on this list and is labelled as ours. Everything factual about another tool is read from that vendor's own published material, with the URL and the date we read it, and each entry says plainly when the other option is the better buy — including ours, which carries what it is not for.
| Tool | Published price | Vendor claims read |
|---|---|---|
| Good Face Project | Not published | 2026-08-03 |
| Cosmetri | Not published | 2026-08-03 |
| CM Studio+ | Free base version; paid capability pricing not published | 2026-08-03 |
| spreadsheets and a regulatory consultant | Not published | Category, not a vendor |
| Tamats (ours) | $99/mo solo or $349 per member, published; free tier | Pricing page |
Best for
Teams wanting a platform that names retailers as a customer segment and pairs compliance with claim validation — note its site does not enumerate which standards are screened.
The nearest neighbour in category: cloud formulation software built around a proprietary ingredient ontology, sold across the whole value chain.
Read from thegoodfaceproject.com on 2026-08-03Full comparisonGood Face Project alternatives
Best for
Deep EU/UK, US FDA and Health Canada regulatory work with services attached; retailer clean standards are not mentioned in their published material.
Cosmetics PLM plus GMP software, sold alongside a regulatory services business — software and the humans who file, in one contract.
Read from www.registrarcorp.com on 2026-08-03Full comparisonCosmetri alternatives
Best for
EU, US and ASEAN government screening at zero cost, with an ingredient marketplace attached.
A free-tier formulation platform bundled with an ingredient marketplace — the closest thing in the category to a zero-cost starting point.
Read from cmstudioplus.com on 2026-08-03Full comparisonCM Studio+ alternatives
Best for
Reading the retailer's published standard yourself against a formula workbook — slow and completely viable for one launch.
The default stack for most indie and scaling brands: a formula workbook, a folder of PDFs, and a consultant on retainer or per project.
Best for
13 retailer programmes — Clean at Sephora, Conscious Beauty at Ulta, Target Clean, Amazon, Credo, Whole Foods, Walmart, CVS, Costco, Douglas and The Detox Market — screened in the same pass as the government rules and browsable publicly without an account.
Not for
Negotiating an exception with a buyer, or reformulating for you. It tells you which ingredient blocks which programme and why; the commercial conversation is still yours.
Check the claim rather than the ranking
Paste an INCI list into the free compliance scan and read the citations yourself — no account, no key. The regulations index lists every market and retailer standard the corpus covers, so you can verify the coverage claim on this page before you trust the rest of it.